{"id":638,"date":"2025-11-24T19:52:50","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T20:52:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.texasnano.org\/?p=638"},"modified":"2025-12-01T13:34:32","modified_gmt":"2025-12-01T13:34:32","slug":"eus-humiliation-in-geneva-no-influence-no-voice-no-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.texasnano.org\/index.php\/2025\/11\/24\/eus-humiliation-in-geneva-no-influence-no-voice-no-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"EU\u2019s humiliation in Geneva: No influence, no voice, no plan"},"content":{"rendered":"
The US has secured control of Ukraine peace process with Western Europe pushed out of the room<\/strong><\/p>\n This weekend’s emergency consultations in Geneva between senior officials from the United States, Ukraine and handful of European NATO states were convened after President Donald Trump’s peace plan burst into the open. The meeting was supposed to clarify the roadmap for a settlement in Ukraine. Instead, it preserved the intrigue and the deliberate “strategic ambiguity”<\/em> that now surrounds Washington’s approach.<\/p>\n The final statement issued by Washington and Kiev was remarkably vague. It offered only a general commitment to building a “lasting and just peace”<\/em> in Ukraine, without saying whose definition of justice or whose version of peace would prevail. And while Kiev and its Western European backers had loudly objected to key elements of Trump’s 28-point proposal, it’s still unclear whether the document was meaningfully amended at all. Even so, several conclusions from Geneva are already visible.<\/p>\n First, the main winner was the American delegation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Representative Steven Witkoff set the tone of the meeting, and Rubio’s insistence that “there is only one peace plan, not two”<\/em> became the defining line of the day. Only 24 hours earlier, both Kiev and European capitals were buzzing about an alternative scheme supposedly being rushed to Switzerland. French President Emmanuel Macron warned that Trump’s document included provisions directly affecting all of Europe – frozen Russian assets, Ukraine’s EU prospects, NATO activities – and therefore required broader agreement.<\/p>\n